From: Ethan B. <ebl...@cs...> - 2006-06-16 18:26:38
|
Jonty spake unto us the following wisdom: > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 13:03 -0400, Luke Schierer wrote: > > The only way I see to even attempt to counteract this tendency is to > > force that small body of users that look to gaim as their client to > > realize that google talk is jabber. If we give in and special case > > this, set up a dummy prpl, then even gaim users would be enabled in > > thinking (and insisting) that google talk is not jabber, but is > > google's own invention. >=20 > What about changing the protocol selector to "Jabber / gTalk" - that way > there is an implicit declaration that they are the same protocol and > avoids special casing the situation. The point is that that *is* a special case. Why should google talk have a special-case string in the Jabber prpl, when thousands of other jabber servers out there do not? > For the sake of a small string change, it would save a lot of hassle. I think the perception of hassle here is skewed. We really get comparatively few questions about this. Maybe there are a lot of users out there who simply don't know to ask about it, but I doubt this is the case... Ethan --=20 The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy for evils]. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. -- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764 |