I wanted to add this as a ticket but unable to do so right now.
when using pidgin [2.3.1] file transfers work for Gtalk, MSN, Yahoo. but when attampting QQ pidgin closes without any error message. I have not upgraded as there is nothing in the changelog that mentions this issue.
Any ideas?
Where can i look for logs etc to try and get more info on what is happening?
PS. I know QQ does not seem to be high on the list of priorities BUT there are a LOT of users in China, that is around 300 Million users! So I hope and wish that developers can push any and all QQ problems a little higher in the priority stakes...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
The problem with QQ isn't that it isn't high enough on our priority list, it is that none of the developers speak enough Chinese to make use of QQ, or understand the protocol much, or if they do speak Chinese use it to begin with. Basically the entire QQ protocol plugin that we have was done via a Summer of Code student and that student has since not worked on it (that I'm aware of). There has been small patching here and there to attempt to keep basic functionality working but anything beyond that is somewhat beyond the time or effort we can give it. If someone, who actually uses QQ, wants to step up and start maintaining it that would be wonderful but without that I think it will likely continue to languish for the forseeable future.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I wanted to add this as a ticket but unable to do so right now.
when using pidgin [2.3.1] file transfers work for Gtalk, MSN, Yahoo. but when attampting QQ pidgin closes without any error message. I have not upgraded as there is nothing in the changelog that mentions this issue.
Any ideas?
Where can i look for logs etc to try and get more info on what is happening?
PS. I know QQ does not seem to be high on the list of priorities BUT there are a LOT of users in China, that is around 300 Million users! So I hope and wish that developers can push any and all QQ problems a little higher in the priority stakes...
The problem with QQ isn't that it isn't high enough on our priority list, it is that none of the developers speak enough Chinese to make use of QQ, or understand the protocol much, or if they do speak Chinese use it to begin with. Basically the entire QQ protocol plugin that we have was done via a Summer of Code student and that student has since not worked on it (that I'm aware of). There has been small patching here and there to attempt to keep basic functionality working but anything beyond that is somewhat beyond the time or effort we can give it. If someone, who actually uses QQ, wants to step up and start maintaining it that would be wonderful but without that I think it will likely continue to languish for the forseeable future.