Unordered sequence
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
objectiser
I would quite like to be able to express a set of interactions that are a set rather than an ordered set of interactions. The sort of thing I would like to be able to express more easily is:
set {
Interaction publish Message on a2bChannel (request)
Interaction publish Message on b2cChannel (notify)
Interaction publish Message on a2bChannel (notify)
}
Where the interactions (or indeed any CDL construct) must happen but the order is unimportant.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1091755
Originator: NO
How does this differ from a parallel?
Logged In: YES
user_id=508109
Originator: NO
How does this differ from a parallel? - Simplicit of expression.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1312539
Originator: NO
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
Logged In: YES
user_id=1091755
Originator: NO
Closed I think because Steve did not respond - reopened until we can decide how this should be handled, as at the moment it is not clear to me how this should be represented in the tool?
From a graphical perspective, is this just replacing the 'parallel' name by the icon with 'set'? Or in the HTML template?