From: Tony B. <to...@to...> - 2003-02-21 19:53:37
|
Well, having been exposed to Phrame about a week or so ago I have involuntarily been advocating Phrame to be in PEAR. To give you some history, I am a fairly new PEAR developer (AUTH_Enterprise and two other packages being developed, one for language translation and the other for sendmail interfaces into PHP apps). By day I am a software development manager for a team of Java developers in a state government. I was reading back on PEAR-DEV posts and ran across some talking about design patterns. The gist was that someone recommended adding design patterns to PEAR. Rightfully so, many PEAR developers said "how do you make a package out of abstract patterns?". Of course for most patterns it does not make any sense. However, I do think you could with MVC. Familiar with struts, I was glad to see a fairly well developed PHP implementation of MVC in Phrame. I have one major issue with the package, namely all actions currently get loaded into memory even though only one may be needed. Despite this problem (which is easily fixable), I think Phrame is on the right track. Now the battle with the PEAR-DEV folks is some are not familiar with MVC and, therefore, can't see how this framework could be packaged up and used quickly by other PEAR packages or stand-alone applications. I think they are starting to see the light but I think they will need a working sample to go off of. With that said, I am emailing this list to let you all know that I may be needing a bit of help and to inform you that I'd be happy to contribute back to Phrame if you'll have me ;-) I think having Phrame in PEAR will be great exposure for you all and it will raise the bar in PHP code quality if it gets decent adoption by others. -- Tony Bibbs "I guess you have to remember that those who don't to...@to... hunt or fish often see those of us who do as harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you think about it, that might be a fair assessment." --Unknown |