Re: [Phrame-devel] ideas

[Arnold C. <arn...@ya...>]

I will certainly take a look at your class this
afternoon.  Thanks for sharing it with the list.  I
know it's a pain in the a$$ right now without CVS but
that will change in the next few days when I'll have
something worthy for the list to take a look at.

I know I must sound like a broken record here but in
my development version of Phrame I have completely
rearchitected the way mappings are handled.  I will
put this in CVS in next day or two... I promise.  :)

My changes regarding the include() and require_once()
were pertaining to the way Phrame currently includes
the files it needs, not the global arrays (although I
am sure that can be improved as well).  require_once()
is certainly a more efficient way of including the
Phrame and application classes.

Arnold

--- Jason Sweat <jsw...@ya...> wrote:
> I think the class detailed in my earlier email (More
> OO way to specify
> mappings) is a much better alternative to the global
> arrays.  Take a look and
> see what you think.
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
> --- Arnold Cano <arn...@ya...> wrote:
> > I'm happy to see an alternative to the current
> include
> > file method in place (which in my opinion is
> > horrible).  My development version uses a process
> very
> > similar to your idea above using require_once().
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com