Re: Relicensing - was - meaning of Php.XPath license?

[<elm...@t-...>]

Nigel Swinson wrote:
> Ok a quick poll of the developers seemed to agree that we are all happy to
> publish Php.XPath under a MPL/GPL/LGPL triple that will maximise the
> usefulness of the class while maintaining it's open source nature.
> 
> The license change will go along with the next minor release of Php.XPath,
> version 3.2, that will be out as soon as the outstanding XPath bugs have
> been fixed, hopefully within a fortnight, but both Sam and I are clogged at
> work at the moment.

The MPL/GPL/LGPL triple seems a solution 
  to me, to relicense existing versions 
from MPL to LGPL/GPL without breaking 
the rules of MPL.

Does anybody of the developers has an 
argument why to publish future versions 
under MPL at all? But yes. It is 
certainly the widest range.

I thank very much you for your decision. 
I think we can wait a fortnight to 
publish the next minor version of COOL. 
I try to run it with 3.2 then.

Regards

Elmar