Re: meaning of Php.XPath license?

[Nigel S. <nig...@us...>]

> As for relicensing, well I think that this is a long debate, the only
> license that I know that modification has to come back to the developper
> is GPL/LGPL.

http://mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html#why-grant-permission
The new Mozilla license scheme (i.e., the MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license) is
arguably consistent with the prior schemes: It too requires that people make
source code available for modifications to Mozilla code (this is required
whether licensees use the code under MPL, GPL, or LGPL terms), and it too
allows Mozilla code to be used in proprietary programs (this is allowed by
the MPL, and also allowed by the LGPL in certain cases).

Nigel