Re: idw - continued

[Nigel S. <nig...@us...>]

> > I think the plan is to support different levels of error reporting, so
when
> > you build the class, you set an option to say what kind of errors you
want.
> > So what you'd do then is say that you don't want errors if the node
doesn't
> > exist and you'd be happy, and if you want it to complain, you can leave
the
> > errors on.  So yeah, we are aiming for this too :o)
>
> sounds good to me.
>
> Don't want to be a pest, but . . . got any idea of an ETA? At the moment,
I'm
> still running the original phpxml script, which is not the most rapid . .
.

Think the plan is something as follows:

- Finish the test harness

V2.3 - February/March

- Tidy and clean up whitespace issues

V2.4 - April/May

- Enhance and optimize

V2.5- Summer

But then you know how these things go.  The brakes have been on fairly hard
over Christmas as I was building my new hardware and software.  Sam and Dan
have both been very busy too.  Under no circumstances should you "plan"
round these release dates.  I'm just giving you an idea as to what the
targets are in my mind.

:o)

Nigel