[phpXML] RE: [phpXML] Re: phpxml Version 1.N.4

[<sh...@co...>]

Is there any hope in sight for the problem
with PHP memory being exceeded when trying to parse
large files (not actually even that large, 675K for
example)?

Thanks


Amy Strycula, Creative Director
Coolshopping.com
http://www.coolshopping.com
http://www.coolshopping.tv
(412) 366-7545   voice
(412) 366-8528   fax

-----Original Message-----
From: lu...@sa... [mailto:lu...@sa...]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:11 AM
To: us...@li...
Subject: [phpXML] Re: phpxml Version 1.N.4


Hello,

Sorry if my question is stupid.. is this a fork ???

Luc

At 23:55 22/07/01 +0000, Ni...@Sw... wrote:
>Spotted a major blunder in 1.N.3.  Well only major if you are using
>operators in your XPath searches.  They all end up getting evaluated as mod
>as I missed the break statements from the switch block.  This means you
>often get div/0 errors as false is interpreted as 0.
>
>Oops. Sorry :o)
>
>Also made what I think is quite an important optimisation to some of the
>evaluate() private functions so that searches with fully qualified node
>positions will take 3 less function calls than they were.
>
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpxmldb/
>
>Nigel


--
This message has been sent through the <phpXML/> user discussion list. To
unsubscribe, please visit
https://sslsites.de/mailinglisten/user/us...@li.../


--
This message has been sent through the <phpXML/> user discussion list. To unsubscribe, please visit https://sslsites.de/mailinglisten/user/us...@li.../