From: Jens D. <web...@pi...> - 2005-08-17 14:38:27
|
Hi, sorry, but atm i cant see some future for phpwiki. I know that we have summer and Reini make some holidays. We make y step to mediawiki. You need this script: http://www.iwilcox.me.uk/2005/07/php2mediawiki/ AND you need php on commandline and a little bit of time. Without php commandline you can forget to convert. Take the script and let it run after editing. go to /wiki/maintenance run php update.php / rebuildall.php after this you have a working mediawiki (we have it), try not the latest beta try 1.4.7. After this you have some ??Handwork??. Check Links (Wikiwords and so on), you have to Upload your Uploads again. If you are german, you need a scripter :-). Some "ü" or "ä" signs are ? after converting. Dont no, if you try it we can help us self and make the script better. Sorry to the phpwiki-Fans all over the world, but somebody like to switch and dont no how. Its not a perfect converter, but for small Wikis or good scripter it will be easy to switch. Regards |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2005-08-18 18:46:36
|
Jens D. schrieb: > sorry, but atm i cant see some future for phpwiki. I know that we have > summer and Reini make some holidays. I'm not making holidays. I'm busy working in the Formula I racing business for the next seasons engines. Besides that PhpWiki is still technically "better" than mediawiki. > We make y step to mediawiki. > You need this script: > http://www.iwilcox.me.uk/2005/07/php2mediawiki/ > > AND you need php on commandline and a little bit of time. Without php > commandline you can forget to convert. > Take the script and let it run after editing. > go to /wiki/maintenance > run php update.php / rebuildall.php > after this you have a working mediawiki (we have it), try not the latest > beta try 1.4.7. > After this you have some ??Handwork??. Check Links (Wikiwords and so on), > you have to Upload your Uploads again. > If you are german, you need a scripter :-). Some "ü" or "ä" signs are ? > after converting. > > Dont no, if you try it we can help us self and make the script better. > Sorry to the phpwiki-Fans all over the world, but somebody like to switch > and dont no how. > > Its not a perfect converter, but for small Wikis or good scripter it will > be easy to switch. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ http://phpwiki.org/ |
From: Jens D. <web...@pi...> - 2005-08-18 19:57:24
|
Hi please understand me not wrong (its not easy with my english ;) ) but i think one developer is not enough. With this speed - how long is phpwiki better than other? You work for Formula I ? Wow....it is a great dream to workd there. All what i can say is that my company is on the outside mirror of an Mercedes ;) Regards and i hope you have fun (it must be a hard work there) Reini Urban wrote: > Jens D. schrieb: >> sorry, but atm i cant see some future for phpwiki. I know that we have >> summer and Reini make some holidays. > > I'm not making holidays. I'm busy working in the Formula I racing > business for the next seasons engines. > Besides that PhpWiki is still technically "better" than mediawiki. > >> We make y step to mediawiki. >> You need this script: >> http://www.iwilcox.me.uk/2005/07/php2mediawiki/ >> >> AND you need php on commandline and a little bit of time. Without php >> commandline you can forget to convert. >> Take the script and let it run after editing. >> go to /wiki/maintenance >> run php update.php / rebuildall.php >> after this you have a working mediawiki (we have it), try not the latest >> beta try 1.4.7. >> After this you have some ??Handwork??. Check Links (Wikiwords and so >> on), >> you have to Upload your Uploads again. >> If you are german, you need a scripter :-). Some "ü" or "ä" signs are ? >> after converting. >> >> Dont no, if you try it we can help us self and make the script better. >> Sorry to the phpwiki-Fans all over the world, but somebody like to >> switch >> and dont no how. >> >> Its not a perfect converter, but for small Wikis or good scripter it >> will >> be easy to switch. > -- > Reini Urban > http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ > http://phpwiki.org/ > > |
From: Stefan <son...@ba...> - 2005-08-20 15:18:45
|
Hello Jens, does the converter also convert RichTablePlugin? Nearly every Page out=20 of our 14.000 pages does use this plugin. Regards Stefan Jens D. schrieb: >Hi > >please understand me not wrong (its not easy with my english ;) ) but i >think one developer is not enough. With this speed - how long is phpwiki >better than other? >You work for Formula I ? Wow....it is a great dream to workd there. All >what i can say is that my company is on the outside mirror of an Mercede= s >;) > >Regards and i hope you have fun (it must be a hard work there) > > >Reini Urban wrote: > =20 > >>Jens D. schrieb: >> =20 >> >>>sorry, but atm i cant see some future for phpwiki. I know that we have >>>summer and Reini make some holidays. >>> =20 >>> >>I'm not making holidays. I'm busy working in the Formula I racing >>business for the next seasons engines. >>Besides that PhpWiki is still technically "better" than mediawiki. >> >> =20 >> >>>We make y step to mediawiki. >>>You need this script: >>>http://www.iwilcox.me.uk/2005/07/php2mediawiki/ >>> >>>AND you need php on commandline and a little bit of time. Without php >>>commandline you can forget to convert. >>>Take the script and let it run after editing. >>>go to /wiki/maintenance >>>run php update.php / rebuildall.php >>>after this you have a working mediawiki (we have it), try not the late= st >>>beta try 1.4.7. >>>After this you have some ??Handwork??. Check Links (Wikiwords and so >>>on), >>>you have to Upload your Uploads again. >>>If you are german, you need a scripter :-). Some "=FC" or "=E4" signs = are ? >>>after converting. >>> >>>Dont no, if you try it we can help us self and make the script better. >>>Sorry to the phpwiki-Fans all over the world, but somebody like to >>>switch >>>and dont no how. >>> >>>Its not a perfect converter, but for small Wikis or good scripter it >>>will >>>be easy to switch. >>> =20 >>> >>-- >>Reini Urban >>http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ >>http://phpwiki.org/ >> >> >> =20 >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practi= ces >Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & = QA >Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5s= f >_______________________________________________ >Phpwiki-talk mailing list >Php...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk > > > =20 > |
From: Jolly G. G. <jgg...@gm...> - 2005-08-20 19:45:58
|
Hi, I'm new. I read the readme's. I copied the files up to my web server ( Widnows box :-( ). I then went to the main index.php page and got the following error... WikiFatalError Cannot open database 'wiki' : '/tmp/wikipagesdb', giving up. PHP Warning: dba_open(/tmp/wikipagesdb,c-): Driver initialization failed for handler: db3: No such file or directory in D:\Webserver\cfjungle.com\www\phpwiki\lib\dbalib.php on line 58 I altered my config.php file by changing the default setting to this... $WhichDatabase =3D 'dba'; I"m on a shared hosted/rental server, and I don't have telnet priviledges. It's running PHP 4.3.something, so I should be okay there. I just downloaded the latest stable version from sourceforge.net. Should this app run by just copying files up, or is there some folder permissions I need to change? I think I may be able to change them with my FTP program. Also, I used my ftp program to check and see if the /tmp folder was created. It was not in the phpwiki directory. Should it have been there? Thanks for any help, guys. JGG |
From: Oliver B. <ob...@de...> - 2005-08-24 10:55:13
|
Reini Urban wrote: > > sorry, but atm i cant see some future for phpwiki. I know that we have > > summer and Reini make some holidays. > > I'm not making holidays. I'm busy working in the Formula I racing > business for the next seasons engines. > Besides that PhpWiki is still technically "better" than mediawiki. But the cleaner coding of PhpWiki doesn't really help the admin or user if there is some issue e.g. with a changed environment (Apache, Php). Since several months I'm considering to start a new public Wiki, but I can't decide which one to use. There are not so many pages to convert from PhpWiki, so I could do the remaining cleanup also manually. Several people reported that Mediawiki has some ugly coding, and I would like to have finer access control. Otherwise it would be my favourite candidate. PmWiki seems to be also nice (and slim compared to PhpWiki!), has access control but I don't know how long it will be supported. Seemingly there are not many people working on it besides Patrick Michaud. When I start a Wiki, I can't spend much time in administration, and I have to be sure that the information keeps accessible for a really long time. Difficult... Oliver |
From: Jolly G. G. <jgg...@gm...> - 2005-08-24 16:41:53
|
I just installed the current version of 1.3.x and I can use dba. My configurator shows... =20 "Supported handlers are: cdb,cdb_make,db3,inifile,flatfile"=20 =20 I pretty much know what flatfile is, but what is cdb and db3?=20 =20 flat file appeals to me because the files are more universal because they are stored as text and can be copied and referenced without PHPWiki if needed. I don't want to store my pages in some kind of format where I can't open them unless PHPWiki is working, even if it means sacrificing some features. Thanks for any help! |
From: Jolly G. G. <jgg...@gm...> - 2005-08-24 16:53:09
|
I just installed the current version of 1.3.x and I can't use dba. My configurator shows... "Supported handlers are: cdb,cdb_make,db3,inifile,flatfile" =20 I pretty much know what flatfile is, but what is cdb and db3? flat file appeals to me because the files are more universal because they are stored as text and can be copied and referenced without PHPWiki if needed. I don't want to store my pages in some kind of format where I can't open them unless PHPWiki is working, even if it means sacrificing some features. Thanks for any help! =20 P.S. Sorry for the repost. I forgot to change the subject, and I put "can" instead of "can't use dba." |
From: Oliver B. <ob...@de...> - 2005-08-24 18:42:28
|
Jolly Green Giant wrote: [...] > P.S. Sorry for the repost. I forgot to change the subject, and I put even if you change the subject, "Reply" is a bad idea, because it keeps the References: (or whatever) header and therefore could cause the mail/news client to display it in the original thread. Better start a new clean thread. Oliver -- Oliver Betz, Muenchen |