Jeff Dairiki wrote:
> Thanks Gary & Reini for the XHTML primer.
> It seems XHTML is backwards compatible with HTML 4, if one takes
> certain precautions. See
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/#guidelines
[snip]
> The biggest problem I see is in the transform code. I know there's som=
e
> pretty kludgy code currently in 1.3 which is concerned with making sure
> the <p>s are properly </p>ed. It would be nice to clean that up.
that's what made me cringe when i went to peek into the wiki code with=20
the hope of making it 100% xhtml compatible, with layout in css.
> (I am planning on re-writing the transform code sometime, to make
> fancy marked-up diff output possible, among other things. But,
> as usual, it might be awhile before I get to it.)
I probably can't help much with the php stuff, though I'm
pretty proficient in matters xhtml (not that it's very complicated!) and=20
css, so if ever my assistance could be of any help, I'd be happy to=20
contribute.
I'm going to be hacking my wiki to make it spit out laundried code=20
anyway, so...
Tara
--=20
Je r=E9ponds au mieux de mes connaissances
Climb to the Stars! - http://climbtothestars.org/
no tables: http://climbtothestars.org/coding/tableless/
Pompeurs Associ=E9s - http://pompage.net/
|
