From: Thomas K. <th...@co...> - 2001-02-16 04:24:46
|
I my thougths a first step towards a object-oriented wiki could be to = allow for nested wiki-tags like in the following examples: WikiTag.SubWikiTag.SubSubWikiTag is interpreted as a whole ..SubWikiTag in a page is prepended with the page-name in links=20 for example in the the page ThomasKalka ..ToDo would link to ThomasKalka.ToDo What do you think ?? Thomas |
From: Steve W. <sw...@wc...> - 2001-03-02 00:17:25
|
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Thomas Kalka wrote: > I my thougths a first step towards a object-oriented wiki could be to > allow for nested wiki-tags like in the following examples: > > WikiTag.SubWikiTag.SubSubWikiTag is interpreted as a whole > > ..SubWikiTag in a page is prepended with the page-name in links > > for example in the the page ThomasKalka > ..ToDo would link to ThomasKalka.ToDo > > > What do you think ?? > > Thomas > > > > > > ...............................ooo0000ooo................................. Hear FM quality freeform radio through the Internet: http://wcsb.org/ home page: www.wcsb.org/~swain |
From: Jeff D. <da...@da...> - 2001-03-02 00:45:38
|
>> I my thougths a first step towards a object-oriented wiki could be to >> allow for nested wiki-tags like in the following examples: >> >> WikiTag.SubWikiTag.SubSubWikiTag is interpreted as a whole >> >> ..SubWikiTag in a page is prepended with the page-name in links >> >> for example in the the page ThomasKalka >> ..ToDo would link to ThomasKalka.ToDo >> >> >> What do you think ?? Yes, I was going to comment on this before, but forgot. (First, I'm not sure I would call this object-oriented!) I did start a wiki-page with similar ideas at: http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/index.php?NewWikiPageNameSemantics UseMod has a SubPage feature which is very similar to what you suggest see http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?action=browse&id=SubPage UseMod uses '/' as the separator between page and subpage. I think '.' makes a much better separator. Perhaps this is because of my Unix background '/ToDo' doesn't look like a sub-page to me --- the leading slash to me indicates a top-level file. Why two leading dots and not just one? Why couldn't .ToDo be enough? Jeff |
From: Malcolm R. <mal...@cs...> - 2001-03-02 00:59:19
|
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 04:47:03PM -0800, Jeff Dairiki wrote: > >> I my thougths a first step towards a object-oriented wiki could be to > >> allow for nested wiki-tags like in the following examples: > >> > >> WikiTag.SubWikiTag.SubSubWikiTag is interpreted as a whole > >> > >> ..SubWikiTag in a page is prepended with the page-name in links > >> > >> for example in the the page ThomasKalka > >> ..ToDo would link to ThomasKalka.ToDo > >> > >> > >> What do you think ?? > > Yes, I was going to comment on this before, but forgot. > (First, I'm not sure I would call this object-oriented!) > > I did start a wiki-page with similar ideas at: > http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/index.php?NewWikiPageNameSemantics How would this affect the readability of links? The current LinkingScheme using WikiWords is nice because it PreservesReadability of the text. I already find that the InterWiki link scheme is distracting enough. Trying to Wiki:ReadASentence with PhpWiki:InterWikiLinks in it is NomicWiki:HardEnoughAlready. Nevermind having Usemod:PathNames/ComplexPathNamesLikeThis. I think non-computer-types are really going to baulk at this sort of thing. I know people who think WikiWords are distracting enough as it is. Malcolm -- Malcolm Ryan - mal...@cs... - http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/ AI Dept, CSE, UNSW, Australia, Phone: +61 2 9385-6906 Fax: +61 2 9385-1814 "He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous." - Matt 5:45 |
From: Thomas K. <th...@co...> - 2001-03-02 14:16:37
|
I`m thinking about using ..WikiName for the following reasons a) In my logic the .WikiName is an operator , something like "part of". Then ..SomeThing would be interpretetd as >>SomeThing is "part of" "."<< and the first "." is the pointer to the actual object. b) It is more error-save then just .WikiTag , which you could produce more easily by mistake. If one allows also NonWikiWords to be used for namig Objects this becomes even more important. c) .something is not as easily recognized by humans as ..something, this is more uncommon. Thomas |
From: Steve W. <sw...@pa...> - 2001-03-02 16:06:37
|
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Malcolm Ryan wrote: > I already find that the InterWiki link scheme is distracting enough. Trying > to Wiki:ReadASentence with PhpWiki:InterWikiLinks in it is > NomicWiki:HardEnoughAlready. > I think non-computer-types are really going to baulk at this sort of > thing. I know people who think WikiWords are distracting enough as it is. I think InterWiki linking is really of interest to Wiki enthusiasts, mostly. It does get some use on Advogato when referring to the definition of a term. ~swain http://wcsb.org/~swain/ ============================================================= "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." -- Frank Zappa |