From: z2d2 <z2...@ea...> - 2002-12-28 21:54:59
|
Re: From: Martin Geisler <gim...@gi...> >This looks like a very bad idea - or rather, it looks like a very >non-standards-compliant way of writing (X)HTML. If we start using such >workaround to fix the bugs in IE, then they'll never get proper >support for PNG images. I don't particularly like workarounds either, but to get webpages to look good cross-browser still requires tricks. Perfect example -- look at all the sites that still use tables to do page layout. Yours, mine, phpwiki, and many many many others. Phpwiki also uses a heavy and light CSS -- another workaround trick for browsers like NS4.x. We all would probably love to use only the latest technology and standards, but the fact is browsers lag behind. Unfortunately, it's in different areas. For unknown reasons, phpwiki's graphics creators have decided to use a technology that IE doesn't render properly. They've probably convinced themselves this is better just like the strftime function. That's their pejorative. For me, I'm going to cater to what the overwhelming majority of people are using today. That's IE5+. |