Re: [Phpwiki-talk] rss

[Jeff D. <da...@da...>]

> Also, is there strictly anything wrong with using dc:description instead
> of description?  I thought that the first was just a fully
> namespace-qualified version of the latter.  The parser ought to be able
> to cope with it.  

No.  They're different.  The default namespace is rss
(http://purl.org/rss/1.0/).
Dc ("Dublin Core", http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/) is, therefore, a
different
namespace.

So they are different.  I am, however, clueless as to what, precisely,
that implies.

It seems reasonable, however, (and the validator concurs) that if we
include
only a single 'description', it ought to be <rss:description> rather than
<dc:description>.