From: Jeff D. <da...@da...> - 2002-10-16 00:56:00
|
> I have a method to search for all groups that a particular user is in > (for use with searches, etc), and I have been coding it so that it > searches for all '/^Group/' pages. But do we want to do this? Or > should we require that for a Group page to be a recognized group page it > > must be listed on a GroupGroups page? Not having thought about it much, my inclination is towards the latter. Mostly because the implementation only introduces one magic page name instead of a whole class of magic page names. As I've said before, I think magic page names are evil. Maybe instead of being listed in GroupGroups, Group pages could just link to CategoryGroup. That maintains most of the advantages of both of your suggestions. > Should I do both (GroupWikiPageOpen and GroupWikiPageClosed)? Not sure. What is the difference, exactly? Can a "closed group" be accomplished just by adjusting page edit/viewing permissions (once one can do that, of course...) Jeff |