From: Adam S. <ad...@pe...> - 2002-03-06 17:44:06
|
> Using a wiki is an excellent answer, but presents several problems, > due to its open nature. Pages would have to be editable only by the > site owners, it would need to allow image upload, and let them be > aligned etc. IMHO ... I think what you've described would be a CMS rather then a Wiki, and lots of them already exist. Sorta the entire point of a wiki is that *everyone* can edit it. While I support the idea that there may be certain pages or certain times when a Wiki doesn't want publicly editable pages, I think it kinda stops being a Wiki when the rule is that only the site owners can edit the pages. > Would it be worthwhile setting up a branch of phpwiki for 'single-owner' use? You might want to check out some of the WikiAsPim pages which are on some of the wiki's. I believe there are good links from the PhpWiki page. Adam. |