Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Another PEAR bug, and the move to adodb (possibly)

[Lawrence A. <la...@us...>]

Yes we can.  We only need to include three or four files.  It might be 
better to check for a previously installed version, or at least allow the 
user to specify whether he wants to use the adodb that comes with phpwiki, 
or some other version.

At 16:31 20/02/2002, Steve Wainstead wrote:
>The reason I chose DB.php in the first place is it will eventually be 
>present on every installation of PHP. They have been very slow to make a 
>clean, featureful version though. Using ADODB means the user (admin) has 
>to install it on her box before installing PhpWiki, which is a barrier to 
>entry I try hard to avoid. (I can't use Galleon or Jabber for that very 
>reason; I can't be bothered to upgrade everything to the latest and 
>greatest just to test something out.)
>
>If we can distribute ADODB with PhpWiki in such a way that it can be 
>called directly, no installation required, then fine, we could do it.
>
>~swain
>
>Lawrence Akka wrote:
>>The backlinks from 
>>http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/alpha/en/CarstenKlapp'sCalendar  do not 
>>work.  It looks like a PEAR quotestring problem to me.  I am pleased to 
>>say that the adodb version works fine (apart from a php notice which is 
>>something to do with the use of multiple index files on the alpha site, I 
>>think).
>>More generally, what are people's views on moving over to adodb permanently?
>>For some issues arising, see 
>>http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/AdodbBackend
>>Lawrence
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Phpwiki-talk mailing list
>>Php...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk
>>
>