From: Jeff D. <da...@da...> - 2002-02-02 22:34:01
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 15:41:55 -0500 (EST) "Steve Wainstead" <sw...@pa...> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: > > > Couldn't the refresh setting on the Edit page be set to zero so that the> > cached copy is ignored and page is always reloaded when the user presses> > "Back"? Then going back to an Edit page would be equivalent to pressing> > "Edit" again, wouldn't it? Up until a couple of days ago, this is (inadvertently) how 1.3.x behaved. (When you turn on PHP's session support, it turns out, by default it sends all kinds of "please don't cache me" HTTP headers which don't get sent when one doesn't enable sessions.) I thought this was what you (Malcolm) were initially complaining about. I certainly prefer (and think safer) the older behavior: that when you back up to a previous edit form, your (unsaved) changes don't get wiped. So a couple of days ago, after Malcolm brought up the subject, I figured out what was going on and "fixed" it. The latest CVS code should act like the old (pre-1.3) PhpWiki: you can back up to a stale edit form without losing any edits you may have made. Now I'm confused. Which way _do_ y'all think is better? |