From: Carsten K. <car...@ma...> - 2001-11-29 04:12:28
|
Sounds reasonable to keep them in /images so it's the only dir accessible by http. Also, we're already talking about moving a whole bunch of stuff as it is, no point in warping our heads around too many new changes at once (well speaking for myself anyway). :-) To everyone on the list: I'm sorry for moving files around without consulting the list first--I won't move anything else on the server for a while. Still having some trouble with my cvs client but I'm pretty sure I just need to do some more reading up on CVS. On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 09:06 pm, Jeff Dairiki wrote: > > Personally, I'd really prefer if images would stay in the images > subdirectory (since then, that's the only sub-tree which needs > to be HTTP accessible, which makes life simpler for lots of people). > If you want to put theme-specific graphics in subdirectories of /images > that makes sense. E.g. "$logo=themes/Forge/SteelyDanSig.png". > > I don't know how anybody else feels about this. You might want to wait > another day or so to see if anyone else pipes up. |