From: Tara S. <te...@cl...> - 2001-11-11 16:37:55
|
Jeff Dairiki wrote: > Were there changes in the CSS related to xhtml compliance? well, let's put it like this. I don't support 4.x browsers, so I hide my=20 stylesheet using the so-called @import hack. the stylesheets which came with the script seemed pretty complex and had=20 lots of useless classes for me, so it was simpler to re-write from=20 scratch. Plus, I simplified the html templates too (I try to avoid using=20 tables for layout, so I look for alternate solutions). so let's say it would be possible to use templates similar to the=20 existing ones with xhtml-compliant code, but they are uselessly heavy imh= o. I guess it wouldn't take too long, based on the html templates I have,=20 to write a css sheet to give the wiki a look similar to the actual 1.3.1=20 one (give or take a few details). not sure if I answered your question though. The main reason I redid the=20 css is that I take a "minimalistic" approach towards html and css. er... not sure that answered either *goes back to migrating wiki pages* Tara --=20 Je r=E9ponds au mieux de mes connaissances Climb to the Stars! - http://climbtothestars.org/ no tables: http://climbtothestars.org/coding/tableless/ Pompeurs Associ=E9s - http://pompage.net/ |