From: Steve W. <sw...@pa...> - 2001-11-07 19:37:03
|
dunno why this wasn't on the list... --- http://www.panix.com/~swain/ "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." -- Frank Zappa ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:38:39 -0800 From: Jeff Dairiki <da...@da...> To: Steve Wainstead <sw...@pa...> Cc: Gary Benson <ga...@in...>, Pablo Roca <pr...@cl...> Subject: Re: user auth/email notification On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:30:01 -0500 (EST) "Steve Wainstead" <sw...@pa...> wrote: > Here's how I'd like to see this work: [...many good ideas deleted...] > (Perhaps later we can expand that to include ACLs, and there will be pages > that can/cannot be edited depending on the user. We can just copy the way > Unix does stuff. I would think that would be enough control.) I say we should plan the ACL mechanism in from the beginning, since we know we want it. Unix-style access controls are, I think, sufficient, provided we include the group access mechanisms (each user can be a member of an arbitrary number of groups; each object can control access to three types of users: the owner (a user), the owning group, everybody else.) On the other hand, why not real ACLs (where one can specify access for multiple users/groups)? Also, and this has been talked about before, with no real resolution, it would sure be nice to find an already written library to handle this stuff for us. I keep meaning to look into the PHPNuke, etc... thingies, but haven't gotten around to it yet. |