From: Adam S. <ad...@pe...> - 2001-09-17 21:09:31
|
> Both seem like clean solutions to the partial locking problem. (Of > course they are of limited use until user authentication is > implemented more completely.) another feature that might be nice would be if a page could have multiple owners or maybe a group owner (and people can belong to a group). this all starts to get more complex but could be really useful. i've had thoughts about tying this into a weblogs karma system, so that any user with positive karma can edit the wiki pages. this provides a way for the community to deal with wiki spammers, and also makes it harder for someone brand new to the page to trash stuff, they have to hang around a little and contribute a bit to get privledges. > Disadvantages: Somewhat kludgy, perhaps. Somewhat restrictive: if a > pagename already exists, one must somehow usurp it (perhaps with admin > assistance ?) to use it as a userid. i don't see that as a problem, it just means that that username is unavailable, which could hapen anyway if there are two AdamShand's on the wiki. if the page name is taken you need to choose a new username. > Is this a crackpot idea or a stroke of genious? i think this is a good idea. adam. |