|
From: Jan N. <ja...@gn...> - 2001-07-13 12:49:02
|
Steve Wainstead <sw...@pa...> writes:
> Here's a sample of an edit macro button. Ugly but functional. When I was
> at the NYT on the Web, I was given the task of evaluating Javascript and
> making recommendations for coding practices in JS on the content
> management system we were building for the editors;
I hope you adviced graceful degradation?
> I found JS has far more capability than most people use,
Exactly. That's one of the reasons you're wise to disable js when
browsing the internet.
> and it's also a really cool language despite being trapped in a
> couple of really crappy browsers.
Ah, you mean the kind of browsers that can't even display those
helpful popup windows, withhold all those magnificent banner
offerings, and enable the disabled to surf the web, and run on your
(Linux) PDA?
As for crappy, that's very much a personal opinion. I have heard of
people that like to use graphical browsers, and navigate using a
mouse. Really!
I very much hope that phpwiki will remain best accessible with any
brower, see eg:
http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/abdesign2.html#javascript
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <ja...@gn...> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
|