From: J C L. <cl...@ka...> - 2001-06-10 07:17:41
|
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Adam Shand <la...@sp...> wrote: > the archiving scheme i'd like to see used is the one described > here: Given the plumetting cost/MB I'd be more interested in implementing a hierarchial storage system where sufficiently old and non-current versions of content is moved to a secondary backing store, away from the primary copy, yet still accessible. Heck, 20Gig of RW SCSI II is less than $200 no, even less if you're silly enough to go with IDE on a server. -- J C Lawrence cl...@ka... ---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows |