From: Jeff D. <da...@da...> - 2001-02-08 14:01:09
|
In message <007401c09194$2fc438f0$0201a8c0@home>,"Thomas Kalka" writes: >What do you think about this: > >a [<number>] is a footnote if it appears somewhere in the text, except for >beeing the first thing in >a line, where it becomes the definition of the footnote ? >Then you could add footnote-definititions where you like and they could all >be displayed at the bottom. I like this idea. (In fact I thought of the same thing last night while lying in bed.) >Another feature about footnotes i thinks its worth thinking about is to >include no-number footnotes. >In that case you wouldnt have to know about the actual count of footnotes to >introduce a new one. >It would be also nice, if footnotes would be automatically numbered. How does one maintain the correct correspondence between reference and footnote? Give them names (which are then automatically converted to numbers)? Jeff |