|
From: Arno H. <aho...@xm...> - 2001-02-08 00:48:46
|
> || Name || Number || Homepage
> || Jeff |} 123-4567 |{ http://x.y.z/
As long as tables are optional and disabled by default I don't
care about the syntax. Go ahead.
> Tables within tables are excessive.
That's what you think. Wait until the first user cries.
Like, why can't I center lines, headings, tables, ...
For me, even single tables are excessive.
> I'm just thinking about redoing the database API's (for versions);
> and thinking that now would be a good time to get rid of carrying aroun=
d
> all those page references (or footnotes).
Footnotes will not appear in the API. Look at nbtsc's wiki.
Btw, I really like the db schema of your previous branch. With some sligh=
t=20
modifications I guess we are on the right track.
> Some text requiring a footnote [[1].
> ...
> ----------
> Footnotes:
> #1# A footnote.
That's almost how it works. No special page for editing them.
It's like text here [1].
blabla
[1] footnote there. Try it out in the latest CVS.
/Arno
|