From: Arno H. <aho...@xm...> - 2001-02-08 00:48:46
|
> || Name || Number || Homepage > || Jeff |} 123-4567 |{ http://x.y.z/ As long as tables are optional and disabled by default I don't care about the syntax. Go ahead. > Tables within tables are excessive. That's what you think. Wait until the first user cries. Like, why can't I center lines, headings, tables, ... For me, even single tables are excessive. > I'm just thinking about redoing the database API's (for versions); > and thinking that now would be a good time to get rid of carrying aroun= d > all those page references (or footnotes). Footnotes will not appear in the API. Look at nbtsc's wiki. Btw, I really like the db schema of your previous branch. With some sligh= t=20 modifications I guess we are on the right track. > Some text requiring a footnote [[1]. > ... > ---------- > Footnotes: > #1# A footnote. That's almost how it works. No special page for editing them. It's like text here [1]. blabla [1] footnote there. Try it out in the latest CVS. /Arno |