|
From: Steve W. <sw...@wc...> - 2001-02-06 19:19:56
|
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Aredridel wrote:
> > I think there are some obvious things to drop, like:
> >
> > references (that is, [1] [2] links)
>
> By all means. Let's drop it. Perhaps put footnotes code in instead of
> references (ala NBTSCWiki)?
I like the footnotes feature; it makes sense vs. the references. Let's add
it.
> > Third, I still long for a better search interface than what we have now
> > (which doesn't work too bad, but could be better).
>
> ooh, yeah... what can we work up, here? I'd like to use regexps, but I'm a
> regexp nut. There's also SQL-like wildcards (% and _) and globs (*, ?, {x,y}
> and [a-q]) that'd be nice as syntax, as well as altavista like boolean ops--
> +foo -bar or standard boolean (and/or/xor/not)
I have to revisit Neilson's "Designing Web Usability." He has a whole
chapter on search interfaces and it has a lot of good practical ideas. In
general, there should be a simple search and an advanced search, so we can
go crazy with the advanced features.
> > Any navigational aids we can contrive would help, like SiteMap, or
> > HotLinks or whatever.
>
> Mmm, and I'd love to see 'em as modules, enablable by adding the block to a
> template or uncommenting something or setting a config variable. I still
> don't like templates that much (which is why I like PHP so much), but it
> makes a lot of sense in many ways.
Excellent idea... I think this is now the case anyways with Arno's rewrite
of transform.php.
~swain
...............................ooo0000ooo.................................
Hear FM quality freeform radio through the Internet: http://wcsb.org/
home page: www.wcsb.org/~swain
|