From: Neil B. <ne...@cs...> - 2000-10-09 22:59:16
|
On Monday October 9, sw...@wc... wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Arno Hollosi wrote: > > > > > Nested DefinitionLists by Neil Brown: > > Looks ok. > > Note: this still relies on tabs. I think we should get rid of tabs ASAP. > > When I added tabless syntax, I skipped term/defs because there was no > clear solution, and nobody uses them (even on c2.com, and in regular HTML > pages). Ward probably coded them in in 1995 when people were still > exploring HTML and might have used them. Anyhow, I will take a look at > that too tonight. There should be a simple syntactic solution. Gee.. I use defintion lists all the time!!! Must just be the way my brain works. The meatball wiki ( http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?TextFormattingRules ) uses: Term with indented definition: [without a blank line between term and definition] ;Term:Definition (indented) ;;Term (indented):Definition (indented two levels) ;;;Term (indented twice):Definition (indented to third level) ...which looks like: Term Definition (indented) Term (indented) Definition (indented two levels) Term (indented twice) Definition (indented to third level) This looks like a reasonable syntax and is in-line with the *** and ### syntaxes for other nested lists. > > > SearchType patch by Neil Brown: > > The actual patch is ok. If a search box should be included in the default > > browse.html should be discussed. I'm quite happy with leave browse.html alone. I just included it in the patch to demonstrate how I would use the extra functionality. NeilBrown |