From: Oliver B. <li...@gm...> - 2010-03-31 13:17:11
|
rei...@gm... wrote: [...PmWiki and DokuWiki als alternative...] note that I did intentionally not mention MediaWiki. It's made for Wikipedia and not for general use. > > > phpwiki has much more features than those two. I don't think so. > > Maybe I don't know enough about the PhpWiki features, because I don't > > know where to look them up. Could you name some important features of > > PhpWiki not found in PmWiki? > > * All database backends, all php versions, all major operating systems, not > just LAMP with php5. Ack (as I wrote). > * Many plugins, in my opinion more, better and easier than mediawiki > plugins. mediawiki just has easier syntax plugins. I don't know MediaWiki, but many PhpWiki plugins are simply not needed in PmWiki. I see not many plugins providing functionality not present in PmWiki. And the documentation of the PhpWiki plugins is definitely worse, so I doubt "easier". > * DynamicIncludePages (IncludePage via Ajax to create tree-like structures > loaded on demand) Can't find useful documentation about this even in SVN. > * Many login and auth methods, just facebook connect and email verification > not yet. Ack. > * Moderated pages The help page says no more than "short description" (as on many other help pages). I included <?plugin ModeratedPage ?> in a page and didn't notice a difference. So I can't check how it works. BTW: PmWiki also knows "draft" edits and user permissions to "publish". > * Semantic relations and queries Reading Help/SemanticRelations, I don't fully understand the difference between relation::pagename and attribute:=value. PmWiki also knows page text variables and has extensive capabilities to use them, e.g. in page lists or conditionals. A very powerful feature. [...] > I also prefer the template inheritance, so that it can easily be extended > whilst not breaking > HTML conformity, in contrary to mediawiki. You might want to have a look at the PmWiki templates. Oliver -- Oliver Betz, Muenchen |