From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2006-03-02 18:47:44
|
Manuel Vacelet schrieb: > I'm about to upgrade my phpwiki installation from 1.3.10 to, at least, > 1.3.11p1 or upcoming 1.3.12. > > I currently using PearDb backend and I'm reaching -sometimes- speed > problems (I guess this is due to table locking). Probably more due to caching, unless you use a real database, not just mysql. There true transactions gain a lot. But fastest is by far the dba backend, because of the communication overhead with the SQL server. > I started to read Adodb backend sources and it appears that this one > seems to be better than PearDB, so I have a couple of question: > * is it possible to switch from a backend to another one ? sure. > * should I use Adodb backend instead of PearDb backend ? why not? > * how mature/stable is Adodb backend ? Stable. With 1.3.12_rc2 I see some asymetries in the transaction logs with postgresql, but it's not critical. > * is Adodb really faster than PearDb ? Yes. > And in a more long term approach: > * Why keeping 2 backends for the same storage medium ? We have more than two. PDO is similar, and there are some more. > * Do you plan to remove one of them ? No. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://helsinki.at/ http://spacemovie.mur.at/ |