From: Joel U. <uck...@no...> - 2005-12-16 19:38:49
|
Thus spake Brian C: > Hi, > > Either your enthusiasm will bring new life to what looks to me to be a > dying project or it will fall on deaf ears. This list mainly receives > spam right now and actual questions about phpwiki tend to go unanswered. There has been an awful lot of spam lately. I wish we could restrict the list so that only subscribers could post. That would solve this problem entirely. (I've changed my mind: Can we start the process for changing the owner of the list?) I think it's not the case that most questions to the list go unanswered. I count only three which weren't answered during November. And most of questions in the help forum are answered. > My installation has been broken for months, searching on Google shows > many people have the same problem, but I cannot get any info on a fix. > See > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8990578&forum_id=4517 I didn't realize that no one had responded to your question. The problem you had has been fixed in CVS for three weeks; the fix will appear in the next release. If you want to stop the warnings yourself, you can edit three of the files in lib/DbSession: SQL.php, PDO.php, and dba.php. Go to the CVS repository web interface http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/phpwiki/phpwiki/lib/DbSession/ and look at the diffs for SQL.php, dba.php, and ADODB.php to see what changed. Or, just replace function _connect() { with function & _connect() { and $dbh = &$this->_connect(); with $dbh = $this->_connect(); everywhere you find them in these three files. If that isn't sufficient, please let me know. > I believe my solution is going to be to move to mediawiki, despite the > extra work this will create for me, because it is possible to get > support for it. Since Wikipedia uses it there is regular development, > and its markup format is becoming something of a standard. > > If this project does want to remain viable that's one thing it should > seriously look into: a script to convert phpwiki markup to mediawiki > markup and then an adoption of mediawiki markup style in a new version. So you think we should just give up, then? -- J. |