From: Matthew P. <mp...@he...> - 2005-04-04 06:54:09
|
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 08:22:19PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > Matthew Palmer a =E9crit : > > You're crying out for a distributed development model. GNU Arch > > (unpleasant UI notwithstanding) can provide all of the features you're > > after. Basically, one (or more!) people maintains a blessed "releases" > > branch, which merges bits and pieces from other contributors as they > > write and test them. Other people can cherry-pick changes from people > > as they like. It's an incredibly powerful model for development; > > unfortunately, it has the downside of tending to melt peoples' brains a > > bit at first, especially if they've been suckling from the CVS teat for > > too long (I speak from experience; my brain got melted). >=20 > OMG !!! I love learning new things on sunday afternoon !! > Thank's a lot, Matthew ! I've been looking for this for years (not > actively, I admit ... still using some ugly homebrew script to rsync cvs > trees) and it was just there, sitting on my gnu linux box ! >=20 > I found 2 deb packages implementing GNU Arch : tla and bazaar. Any > experience with them ? Yes, with both. tla is the "original" implementation, while bazaar is a branch of tla (from Canonical, the people behind Ubuntu) to improve the user experience of Arch for the common user. I'd recommend bazaar, it's just th= at much nicer to work with. A lot of the documentation out there is tla-specific, though, so it's a bit of a tradeoff in that respect. - Matt |