Re: [Phpwiki-talk] No problems!

[Reini U. <ru...@x-...>]

Dan Frankowski schrieb:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>> Stan Berka schrieb:
>>
>>> I've had some problems installing and then upgrading the PhpWiki on 
>>> our internal Apache/Win2K with MySQL server.  Since I have solved 
>>> those problems, it works just fine, day in, day out.  So, I'm writing 
>>> to praise the system, not ot complain.  It's part of my work style, 
>>> to write what issues arise, the solutions, in a like-blog style.  For 
>>> me and and the rest of the team.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Apache/Win2K with MySQL is the platform I'm developing, so that's the 
>> easiest.
>> Old linux systems with old pear, broken dba and 8MB memory limits are 
>> the real problem.
> 
> As you know by now :-), I would say you shouldn't support so many 
> backends. Then a lot of time spent maintaining them all could be better 
> spent making one or two of them perform really well.

Well, the good stuff is only done in ADODB, because this has 
transactions and a fast pecl backend solution. (via php_adodb.so)
The rest is backporting to the others when time permits.

And of course the best (fastest and least memory by far) backend is 
still dba, if the locking problems would not exist on certain platforms.
Even gdbm is broken on the php side, but at least they acknowledged it 
lately.
I had no time yet to test the new 5.1 PDO stuff.

I'm still tyring to bring the sf.net platform back to dba, because this 
would ultimatively solve our memory problems. But this will break the 
new anti-spam solution with mysql accesslog analysis.

sf.net demo is still broken because of my new include_path pear 
prepending logic. fill be fixed soon.

> And my idea of having 1e6 pages, wikipedia-style, and still use
>> caching and ob_buffers.
> 
> I am a big fan of this scale testing. Good job.

you started this. thanks to you.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/