From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-08-22 12:25:09
|
Dan Kamins schrieb: > I spent a few hours digging into 1.3 source. Wow, it looks like a complete rewrite. I didn't expect so much to change in a minor version. I'm glad I didn't spend too much time familiarizing with the 1.2 codebase! Sorry for the mail. > > I'm kind of at a standstill now though, because 1.2 doesn't have the features I need (as mentioned below) or work on my server without modifications, and 1.3 crashes my server in a weird way ( http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1013350&group_id=6121&atid=106121 )... What to do... Anybody seen this PCRE crash before? > >>From the bug report, this code crashes (which is a simpler version of what my ConvertOldMarkup() does to the file OldTextFormattingRules during virgin setup): > $pat = "/\A((?:.|\n)*?)(^(?:[ \t]+\S(?:.*\s*\n[ \t]+\S)*|". > "\|(?:.*\n\|)*|[#*;]*(?:[*#]|;.*?:)|\[\s*(\d+)\s*\]|". > "<\?plugin(?:-form)?\b.*\?>\s*$|!{1,3}[^!]).*$)\n?/m"; > $subj = str_repeat("123456789 ", 50); > preg_match($pat, $subj); yes, this is a known issue. cause still unknown. happens only with huge anchored regex. please remove pgsrc/OldTextFormattingRules on virgin setup. > Ouch! > > -- > Dan Kamins > > On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:34:12 +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > >>Dan Kamins schrieb: >> >>>Hi guys. First of all, let me say that PhpWiki is great! I just >>>got into the Wiki world, evaluated a bunch of Wiki packages, and >>>almost immediately left the Wiki world in disgust until I found >>>PhpWiki, which is well-organized, efficient, straightforward, and >>>configurable. Kudos. Now before I get too far down the path of >>>using it, there are a couple of changes I was going to request, >>>but I would actually be happy to do them myself and submit >>>patches. So what I wanted to ask was a) how do you feel about >>>these changes, and b) how should I submit them. It may be >>>possible these are already in the 1.3 branch, but I've only >>>installed and worked with 1.2 stable so far. In fact, maybe >>>you've discussed and/or included these in 1.3, but I didn't see >>>either in the mail list archives or patch history. >>> >> >>All your requests are in the 1.3.x branch and much more. 1.3 is by >>far better, you'll like it! >> >>And please post to the mailinglist, not to the indidviduals. >> >> >> >>>1. Superglobals... >>> >>> >>>As of PHP 4.2.0, register_globals went from ON to OFF by default. >>>Many servers operate in this new mode, which is far more secure >>>now. The effect is that PhpWiki doesn't work! And I'm *SURE* a >>>lot of users go through what I did: install 10 different Wiki >>>engines and evaluate them. When it doesn't work right out of the >>>box for mysterious reasons, you're going to lose a lot of >>>potential users. I had to dig deep to figure out what the problem >>>was, and I think a lot of people would just move on. >>> >>> >>>The problem manifests itself as the fact that you can't click on >>>anything because all the links are broken. It's easy to fix, and >>>just requires changing all global implicit vars to explicit >>>superglobal references. Like $DOCUMENT_ROOT becomes >>>$_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']. A poor workaround is to slam a big >>>set of code up at the top of config.php that does something like: >>>if (isset($_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'])) $SERVER_NAME = >>>$_SERVER['SERVER_NAME']; if (isset($_SERVER['SERVER_PORT'])) >>>$SERVER_PORT = $_SERVER['SERVER_PORT']; if >>>(isset($_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME'])) $SCRIPT_NAME = >>>$_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME']; ... The right way to do it is to just >>>reference the superglobal names directly. This will break >>>compatibility with PHPs older than 4.1.0 (when superglobals were >>>introduces), but does anybody really use PHP that old? >>>There are a LOT of these variables in the source, but I am >>>volunteering to change them. >>> >>> >>>The motivation and history of this is clearly explained at this >>>link: http://us4.php.net/manual/en/security.globals.php >>> >>>I saw a discussion regarding this ("superglobals policy") on the >>>mail archives: >>>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=2051713 >>>Valid points were brought up, but that was almost 2 years ago, >>>and the world has changed a lot. I think it's time to revisit >>>this issue (if it hasn't been yet). >>> >>>--- >>> >>> >>>2. Author-Independent Archiving... >>> >>> >>>In 1.2 stable, only changes made by different authors get >>>archived and are thus diff-able. So if I make a change, then >>>make another change, I lose my intermediate change history. >>>Maybe this is fine for many users, but I'm 100% other users would >>>like every change archived (as I am one of those users), and this >>>is functionality many other engines provide. I propose adding a >>>config variable (like "ArchiveOnlyWhenAuthorChanges" defaulting >>>to TRUE, which would be same behavior as now) which would be >>>checked in savepage.php at the point of archiving the old data. >>>If set to FALSE, then every change would be archived. >>> >>> >>>--- >>> >>> >>>Thanks for listening. Let me know what you think about these >>>issues and keep up the good work. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwiki-talk mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk > -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |