Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Some questions about CVS

[Reini U. <ru...@x-...>]

> ru...@x-... wrote:
>> Only in earlier versions it was not or partially implemented. With
>> latest CVS it works okay.
>
> Speaking of CVS, what's the official recommendation on whether to use
> the latest stable (1.3.10, correct?) vs updating with every CVS commit
> that doesn't break stuff?
>
> I run my wiki mostly for myself, so it doesn't need to be
> commercial-production stable. On the other hand, I don't want to have
> 25% of features broken at any given time.
>
> So: how reliable are the CVS versions, generally speaking?

If something new is broken in CVS I usually post a message to this list.

The problems in current CVS also exist in earlier releases.
The question is how long back?

The problems mostly concern mysql installations with --memory-limit and
a large number of pages (about > 400).

We also started experimenting with database improvements lately.
First ADODB and if this works stable, it'll get ported to PearDB also.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/~rurban/


-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/~rurban/