From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-06-25 09:22:32
|
Dan Frankowski schrieb: > One of the changes is to add an error handler (instead of just an assert > handler). This is useful because then if there is incorrect PHP syntax, > vars missing, etc., the tests don't run. In other words, the tests get > more picky, which is good. When they get more picky, they want an > existing testbox with some stuff in it (InterWikiMap, global_data, a few > other things). Thus, I want to make a "testbox" in CVS with the right > stuff and check it in, as I did on our local copy. > > Since I do not wish to make changes that you don't want, please tell me > that you approve. Then I'll go ahead and make the unit test changes, > including adding a CVS-tracked "testbox" with stuff in it. approved. but the name "testbox" compared to out intermediate ".testbox" might not fully understandable. can you think of a better name? In a perl CPAN test framework the call it "t" (for the logic) and "output" (for the output which should be tested against). i'm not quite accustomed to the java unittest structure. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |