From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-06-25 09:11:09
|
Jon Åslund schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:48:29PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > >>Currently I'm investigating problems with application/xhtml+xml, which >>brings out some problematic XHTML code in the templates. >>Esp. javascript does not work as expected. (This is needed for some >>XHTML extensions, like MathML or SVG). > > > http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/01/14/eddies_in_the_spacetime_continuum1 > > There are still issues with XHTML 1.1, the way it should be served. It > doesn't work with Internet Explorer, the error handling of xhtml+xml > documents in browsers where it does work is quite weak, and it uses > XML DOM instead of HTML DOM, though not really bad, confuses many > javascripts. I have no idea how to develop for the web with the > "current" (as of 3 years) recommended standards. If you find a > feasible solution, mainly the IE problem, please tell me how you did > it. I'm aware of the IE issues and more. We can output the headers according to the browser. The biggest problem is the inability to do document.write() (signout button, edit toolbar) with application/xhtml+xml or text/xml. http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |