From: Electrawn \(J. Potkanski\) <ele...@ya...> - 2004-02-28 18:01:47
|
I still have much love for postnuke, with all its broken development. Has something to do with the tons of modules available for it. Want something pretty? Look at www.xoops.org . That is _pretty_ code. ph...@de... schrieb: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:50:01 +0100, Reini Urban <ru...@x-...> wrote: > => I seem to like postnuke's features. > <snip> > => PhpWiki is technically soo much better than postnuke, so it makes > => writing new modules here more fun than there. It just looks better > => there, admitted. > > I haven't posted to the list in a couple years. My Wikis are very old > now but still running fine with happy users. I'm very much looking forward to > the new stable 1.38 (and 1.4.0) - thanks from a non-coding lurker. > > Anyway, if you like the xxnuke CMS approach and are interested in wiki > implementation related to them, I'd highly recommend looking at the next leap > forward from phpnuke and postnuke: www.xaraya.com - its development community > was a spin-off from the implosion at postnuke and they've done an incredbile > job and are almost at their magical 1.0 release: > http://www.xaraya.com/ > I think you'd like it, especial as a "former lisp programmer". yes, xaraya. another split in the nuke community... their code is a bit better than ours. any a bit more lines. code looks fine, just those long function prefixes, and the web page looks too professional (closed), without any user interaction which should drive this. looks like they need money but no users. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Phpwiki-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk |