RE : [Phpwiki-talk] Is there a flow diagram for the components?

[<jw...@fi...>]

Hello,
A while ago i did the attached drawing of the sequential flow within =
phpwiki

This was a first draft as I didn't get time to continue, but it may help =
for
the doc overhaul.

I can send the visio version to those who want it (sorry I hadn't =
installed
Dia at the time..)

J=E9r=F4me


-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: php...@li...
[mailto:php...@li...] De la part de electron
Envoy=E9=A0: vendredi 27 f=E9vrier 2004 08:15
=C0=A0: php...@li...
Objet=A0: RE: [Phpwiki-talk] Is there a flow diagram for the components?

Doxygen is fine. PhpWiki needs a BIG doc overhaul anyway.

My suggestion to those who want to understand what is going on with =
PhpWiki
is to use an IDE (Integrated Development Environment).

I use phpEd by nusphere.com. It comes with a professional version of the =
php
module DBG (2.16) which connects to apache and does code steping!

There are other products like Zend Studio and open source ones like =
phpEdit
and a couple I can't remember. Each works well. Komodo deserves a =
mention.

There are PEAR modules to help debugging as well and a couple of others.

All things need to be evaluated based on cost and setup. (Hence why I =
choose
phped!)

-Jtp




I've stopped 7,398 spam messages. You can too!
One month FREE spam protection at http://www.cloudmark.com/spamnetsig/}

-----Original Message-----
From: php...@li...
[mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of Oliver =
Betz
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:54 PM
To: php...@li...
Subject: Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Is there a flow diagram for the components?

Reini Urban wrote:

> Whit Blauvelt schrieb:
> > Probably this is just a documentation request, but it would be =
really
> > helpful if there were a good visualization of the inter-relation of
> > PhpWiki's components, particularly the plugin design.=20
>=20
> That would be indeed  very helpful. Once you are in it, you will =
admire=20
> it, but it needs some time to get into it...

Maybe a documentation tool like doxygen could help.

I started using it in my last embedded project and it's really useful=20
and very little effort to maintain. Besides putting special marked=20
comments into the right places of the documentation, it generates=20
nice cross reference lists or even graphs with AT&T's dot.

I have to admit that using doxygen only for C programs, I'm not sure=20
how good it is in extracting information from PHP code.

If wanted, I could try it with the Phpwiki code.

Do you think, Pwpwiki programmers would accept to use doxygen=20
comments? This would make it even more useful as it is the intended=20
use of doxygen...

Oliver
--=20
Oliver Betz, Muenchen




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id438&op=CCk
_______________________________________________
Phpwiki-talk mailing list
Php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk