From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-02-24 17:06:49
|
Paul Bloomfield schrieb: > Is the change to the way line breaks work in new markup intentional? I think so. > It seems that a single end-of-line (EOL) is parsed as an end of line in > the HTML, rather than a <br />. To get a <br /> you have to force it > with %%%. I cannot work with this - it is unlike any other wiki I know. Well, we wanted to overcome wrapped text problems in certain envoriments, like this email client here. you simply don't know if the text is autmatiaccyl warpped or manually broken. you decide to break it either by starting a new paragrahp, or by using %%% or <br>. > What would work much better is for the default for an end of a line to > be a <br />, unless that line were terminated with a / or something, in > which case it would flow on. Double EOLs of course stay as closing a > </p>. we never thought of a terminating "/". maybe jeff will try to implement this in his block parser. > Is this already switchable, if not can it be made switchable (or got rid > of altogether), or does the community prefer what we have now with %%% > anyway so I'd better just get on and code it myself? why not use <br> for intentional linebreaks? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |