Re: [Phpwiki-talk] Greetings: pnPhpWiki

[Reini U. <ru...@x-...>]

electron schrieb:
> My name is Jason. I run phpWiki as a postnuke module @ http://www.gs4.org.
> 
> I am in the process of updating lakka's PN module to 1.3.8pre.  Devel:
> http://www.gs4.org/dev . I'll eventually add it to noc.postnuke.com if they
> get their Gforge software in order. Maybe this can be a subproject of
> PhpWiki?

Fine, I tried this yesterday, but didn't finish it. (phpnuke-7.0, 
postnuke is much better, but i wanted to start with the worst)
I did the guiki-phpnuke module instead. much easier and looks better.

Note that with &frame=body argument hack you can display just the body 
(or any other template) and not the head, or better fix the head.tmpl.

> 1.) diff.php and diff3.php do not use the template system. This causes me to
> have to make some dirty hacks to those files. I may fix it as soon as I move
> pnPhpWiki to a post-alpha stage.

thanks.

> 2.) WikiUserNew.php gives me a real headache. Can this be better documented
> about who/what/when stuff gets called. For now I hacked WikiUser.php to use
> postnuke permissions. It works, but I figure WikiUserNew is the future?

Hmm, what's the problem? It doesn't do any output.
The real problem are the template and WikiLink and WikiUrl fixes.

For strict db auth against the nuke db set USER_AUTH_POLICY to "first-only"
and the $USER_AUTH_ORDER array to "Db" only.

> Squish:
> 1.) Added a patch to SourceForge to add a default limit for adodb and
> recentchanges. If limit isn't set it was just returning one item which is
> hardly useful.

haven't I fixed this adodb limit bug recently in CVS?
anyway I added it, since it makes sense.

> I'll lurk on SourceForge forums for a while and watch this list as well. I'm
> a big fan of adodb (what postnuke uses as well) and I'll see what we can do
> to migrate phpWiki off FETCH_ASSOC. Another note: The SourceForge
> pages/forums/etc. need cleaning, do you need a volunteer?

Agreed, FETCH_ASSOC is really annoying for the auth_sql staements.
I'd prefer MYSQL_NUM. Or do you need FETCH_BOTH?
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/