From: Bishop <bi...@pl...> - 2003-12-15 06:34:40
|
> Hello All, > > wouldn't it be nice if this list would set the Reply-To: to the list > address? Many times I forget to correct the address when answering to > the list, and the reply goes to the poster instead of the list. -1 I don't usually write so much mail to so many people, just so that my mail isn't soon seen as 'spam.' Likewise, although I have procmail weeding out these reply-to addresses, my preference is also that lists DON'T force replies back to the list. Replying only to the author of a message - unless the message specifically should be one addressed to the entire list - and having the author of the original messages assemble a follow-up to his/her original post in order summarise the responses, helps keep mail traffic down while still keeping the information high. Signal/noise and all that. > And I would also set the list to accept mail only from subscribers > due to two reasons: spammers send mail to this list *), and I don't > want to send (successfully) by accident with the mail address of my > employer. +1 While that one's a bit of a hassle to force posters to subscribe, it avoids a lot of crap posting from spammers who may be wanting to harvest brain dead 'away'/'vacation' messages. A product of the times, setting member-only to posts on a list is now almost a required thing. In short, I'm all about signal-noise ratios. |