From: Meiste, G. <me...@ms...> - 2004-01-21 02:50:05
|
Hi all! I've been working on an update to my mailing lists module. The current version is 0.3.3 - however, it is currently being reported to boost to be 0.33 I have been using numbers with only one decimal in the version number since 0.10 because I didn't realize that "0.1.0" (with quotes) would be accepted by boost. Now, everyone is using the two decimal approach but me. I believe the two decimal approach is a "more correct" way to report versions and would like to switch to it. My question is this: When I update to 0.4.0, can I report "0.4.0" to boost and all will update well? I don't want to cause problems with people's sites can I'm being anal about a version number. If it is too risky I'll just stick to 0.40. However, I wouldn't think it would cause any problems, but I'm throwing it out to you guys for your opinion. What do you think? Thanks in advance! Greg "blindman1314" |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2004-01-22 14:13:22
|
You could just take the plunge and have your next version be 1.0.0. Then go 1.1.0 etc from there on. The 3-digit approach is correct because it signifies major-minor-patch releases. Don. On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0600, Meiste, Gregory wrote: > Hi all! >=20 >=20 > I've been working on an update to my mailing lists module. The > current version is 0.3.3 - however, it is currently being reported to > boost to be 0.33 >=20 >=20 > I have been using numbers with only one decimal in the version number > since 0.10 because I didn't realize that "0.1.0" (with quotes) would > be accepted by boost. Now, everyone is using the two decimal approach > but me. I believe the two decimal approach is a "more correct" way to > report versions and would like to switch to it. >=20 >=20 > My question is this: When I update to 0.4.0, can I report "0.4.0" to > boost and all will update well? I don't want to cause problems with > people's sites can I'm being anal about a version number. If it is > too risky I'll just stick to 0.40. However, I wouldn't think it would > cause any problems, but I'm throwing it out to you guys for your > opinion. >=20 >=20 > What do you think? Thanks in advance! >=20 >=20 > Greg >=20 > "blindman1314" --=20 "When I'm the president, we're not going to obfuscate when it comes to fore= ign policy." George W. Bush January 7, 2000 Republican Debate in New Hampshire. |
From: Jake C. <jak...@gm...> - 2004-01-22 18:50:26
|
All!!! Speaking of this module problem can anyone ppplllleeeeaaaasssseeee take a look at why my module is not comming up on all the pages on phpwebsite 0.9.3-2 even though $allow_view="all" was set in boost? I checked it in the DB and everything looked to be correct but it just doesn't work and only works when I go to it specifically like http://localhost/?module=test I simply want to have it show up in all pages like the menu maker module and alike. I looked even copied menu maker and stripped it to make it basic but still didn't work? Please please please please help me :-\ My test module can be downloaded at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php? group_id=15539&atid=115539&file_id=74246&aid=881253 Thanks! - Jake On Jan 22, 2004, at 6:13 AM, Don Seiler wrote: > You could just take the plunge and have your next version be 1.0.0. > Then go 1.1.0 etc from there on. > > The 3-digit approach is correct because it signifies major-minor-patch > releases. > > Don. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0600, Meiste, Gregory wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> >> I've been working on an update to my mailing lists module. The >> current version is 0.3.3 - however, it is currently being reported >> to >> boost to be 0.33 >> >> >> I have been using numbers with only one decimal in the version >> number >> since 0.10 because I didn't realize that "0.1.0" (with quotes) >> would >> be accepted by boost. Now, everyone is using the two decimal >> approach >> but me. I believe the two decimal approach is a "more correct" >> way to >> report versions and would like to switch to it. >> >> >> My question is this: When I update to 0.4.0, can I report "0.4.0" >> to >> boost and all will update well? I don't want to cause problems >> with >> people's sites can I'm being anal about a version number. If it is >> too risky I'll just stick to 0.40. However, I wouldn't think it >> would >> cause any problems, but I'm throwing it out to you guys for your >> opinion. >> >> >> What do you think? Thanks in advance! >> >> >> Greg >> >> "blindman1314" > > -- > "When I'm the president, we're not going to obfuscate when it comes to > foreign > policy." > > George W. Bush > January 7, 2000 > Republican Debate in New Hampshire. |
From: aDarkling <ju...@re...> - 2004-01-22 16:57:28
|
Greg! You can check to make sure, but I believe that the version # is stored as a textfield in the database. If that's true, then text comparison rules should apply. -Eloi- |