On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:55:44PM -0500, Todd Owen wrote:
> Richard Rowell initially recommended ADODB.
> [...]
> Karsten and I then recommended PEAR. I thought it would be a better choi=
ce
> because it was poised to be more "official" and is being merged with phpl=
ib.
I like phplib, because it is very clean, simple and fast. Besides that, I
worked with it and know my way around it's use. I looked at ADODB and it
seems to have a sensible interface. I did not look under the hood, though.
Has anybody some experience about ADODB's speed? That seems to be one of the
most critical issues.
> Maybe it's me, but I think PEAR can only be retrieved from CVS. We do ne=
ed
> to make a decision though.
No, it should come with any PHP4 release (and it did on my setup). But I
dislike the PEAR idea more and more. Not beacuse PEAR is bad itself, but
because the actual PEAR:DB thing seems to be "slow by design". And we
shouldn't really help Intel and AMD with their marketing :-)
> I propose the developers consider this very important decision over the n=
ext
> week, but set a deadline of next Friday to make the decision.
I will go with the majority, whatever result may come up. But please read my
reply to Geoff Staples mail regarding phplib.
Regards,
Karsten
--=20
Why do we have to hide from the police, daddy?
Because we use emacs, son. They use vi.
-----------------------------
mailto:k.d...@tu... w=B3: http://www.k-fish.de/
gpg: http://www.k-fish.de/mykeys.gpg
|
