From: Greg M. <drk...@co...> - 2006-03-14 04:39:16
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew McNaney wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 14:59 -0500, Verdon Vaillancourt wrote: > >>BTW, is there a dedicated bug-tracker for fallout where I should submit >>stuff like this, or should I use the general phpws one at sourceforge? > > > For now, just email me. I think we should decide on how to set-up > sourceforge for Fallout. > > Should (can?) we create new bug, patch, and feature request areas or > would we have to register a new project? Any ideas on this? I suspect > Fallout will need a separate area to get up to full workable status. I guess the existing trackers can be used. A new group or category could be created to classify the bugs/patchs/requests as fallout/cvs/1.0.0 etc. Verdon brings up a good point as I have several questions or items to file. For example, I can see what you are trying to do with the new boost module. However, I think you took one step back on the module. Displaying the "local" version number of each module and the "local" release version of phpWebSite is important information during trouble shooting with users. Is there an obvious place that I don't see this? Is there another way that you planned on showing this information? I was also thinking that you may have configured some of the module boost information to test various pieces of the boost code, etc. Greg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEFkjpxyxe5L6mr7IRAh2FAJ0c/uTLyxNYlqKvZ1dejhAknfjqEwCbB8dx FUZWgev1FmsZXLOTB1b2Jhc= =a/zM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |