From: Greg M. <drk...@co...> - 2005-07-23 20:39:21
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt, The issue of SourceForge support issues was brought up in the IRC channel. Please see the log here http://www.phpwebsitemanual.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=103&date=20050723. SF has prevents -comm from doing many things. So I raised the question of another web hosting company providing support for the -comm wiki and a later phpWebsite and blindman1344 wiki. mhnoyes said I should bring it to your attention. Several people have offered free support for the hosting. I know that singletrack, wendal911 and blindman1344 have all offered. One of the issues with the wiki doc being in mediawiki is that the -comm site then does not eat its very own dog food. I agree and know the issue. However, at the same time I tried doc book using to extend what you guys had already provided. It sucked big time. I just didn't have the patience figure it all out. However, with the content management angle of phpWebSite and wiki they both lower the barrier to produce documentation. I have gone on to collect FAQ material from the forums. I use the forum posters question and then create or reference existing wiki doc. It has been effective for me in answering the same forum post over and over again. The problem now with the SF web service is that the page may not paint when a user goes to the answer. Hence, my question about the hosting issue. Where should the -comm site be moved to solve these problems? I don't see an issue with the SF release tools, etc so they can still be used but the capabilities of SF short change what we can show for phpWebSite. Greg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC4qrnxyxe5L6mr7IRAv09AJ4+VEbha5+CflYjWZFB2QO/xK2hCwCgogzs plpCsvl6pwQBDZdtgzFm84s= =53WC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |