From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2004-08-10 18:42:39
|
> I always thought blank lines between blocks of text was the best way > of indicating they are a separate block of text. Some people call them > paragraphs. Not sure it'll catch on though. ;-) Wow. There's an actual *name* for them?!?! Note: For those who aren't sure if we're joking or not, I was more referring to those instances where you wanted your users to be able to make a sidebar that sticks to the right side with a company logo background/watermark and an image rollover as the title. All they'd have to do is select that template and enter the text. > It's a pity to have to make a section of users 'second class' by > implementing a solution that works for the majority of users but the > simple answer is > > a) switch javascript on > b) Use Firefox Naw, we're still back at square one because a lot of corporations prohibit the use of javascript on the company-mandated browser (usually IE). My sitelogs show that most browsing is being done between 9-4 on Mondays through Fridays on the bosses' high-bandwidth line. It's weird. You can actually set your watch by looking at where users are logging in from. > Then you're down to just the special cases of providing access for the > disabled and I can't imagine that a wysiwyg tool is any worse than the > textarea/buttons we have now. I think it would be worse in the sense that the exsistence of a wysiwyg tool encourages people to use more markup, making a text version more unreadable. Take a look at http://www.interactivetools.com/products/htmlarea/index.html#demo using FireFox. Takes you a while to understand where to edit what. A blind editor would be dealing with that all day long. |