From: Shaun M. <sh...@ae...> - 2004-08-10 02:43:23
|
On 8 Aug 2004, at 21:28, Eloi George wrote: > > Personally, I think our collective coding time would be better spent > on quite a few other core class ideas than a universal section class. > There are only a very few possible uses for the page/section paradigm, > and I'm constantly looking for an easy-to-use, > non-javascript-intensive way to get away from it and still retain the > layout flexibility. > Since the sections are mostly a way to manage and layout images alongside text rather than to divide text into sections, the problem is really to solve an easy way for newbies to insert and manage images without knowing html. Maybe that is actually best served by a wysiwyg tool like htmlarea/hypertextarea as it looks like Word rather than them having to work out templates and sections. The only real (ignoring weird things like PDAs and phones) problem area is Mac users on MacIE and Safari as there isn't a solution for them. Then again, that's a small bunch to annoy and they can always use Firefox instead. Safari v1.2.3 has just been released and I could have sworn Hyatt was saying it'd have contentEditable in that version. I'll have to find out although Apple take a while to actually release changelogs. MacIE is a dead product anyway. Personally, I end up ftping my images up and typing in the html myself and not using sections a lot of the time. Maybe there should be an 'advanced' interface which just simply had a method of uploading images and a simple 'click on the thumbnail' interface that inserted the html at the cursor. A Preview button is handy also that would preview the page in a separate window so you could see your layout whilst editing. Then you just need Page breaks and TOCs. In 0.8x I just added a bit of code that looked for [PAGE BREAK] in the content. Maybe something similar. Shaun aegis design - http://www.aegisdesign.co.uk |