From: Ulf H. <U1...@ul...> - 2004-07-01 17:15:33
|
hmm. would that mean that information-driven sites would have to stick on the current version and remain un-updatable for good? Bummer. As I said, I am running some sites like that. They work great - am willing to show you, but I dont want to post the links across the whole list. I am not sure if I am asking for so much. I understand the issue of huge language tables, of un-translated comments and your strive for perfection. Hoewer, perfection might not be what the business out there is asking for. I for one need a reliable system that works and that can handle more than one language. Running different sites for each language is not an option for me, as it creates an admin overhead in most cases. Many sites are only partially translated (ony the most important "core" information) - distributing different languages across different sites would result in incomplete content in some languages. Which leads to users getting confused. Not to speak about having N systems to upgrade one a new version of the framwork gets release, to apply N patches, N sets of custom code and opening N times more potential security issues.... For now, the current debate is IMHO more a political than a technical issue (as solutions exist which might not be optimal but which are sufficient for a lot of users). My fear is, once you go ahead and apply the po technology, the lang module and some nice opportunities that come with it vanish. I guess what I am trying to acomplish is to reduce the hassle you are talking about - for me some improvements in the lang mod and in the guidelines of it being supported by other mods would do the trick. Ulf Matthew McNaney wrote: >a lot. > > > |