Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Module versions in boost

[Jake C. <jak...@gm...>]

THANKS THAT HELPED A LOT!!!

Do I have to include all my classes manually now in the runtime file  
also now? I'm not sure but thats what it looks like because of the  
require_once() thing they mentioned :-\

Thanks
- Jake

On Jan 22, 2004, at 11:27 AM, Meiste, Gregory wrote:

> Sounds like you are missing:
> inc/runtime.php
>
> Check out the following URL if you haven't already:
> http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu/index.php? 
> module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view
> _page&PAGE_id=51&MMN_position=58:13
>
> Lots of changes for 0.9.3-2 and I don't know if the Dev Crew stressed  
> that
> enough to people.
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Connor [mailto:jak...@gm...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:50 PM
> To: Don Seiler
> Cc: php...@li...; Meiste, Gregory
> Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Module versions in boost
>
> All!!!
>
> Speaking of this module problem can anyone ppplllleeeeaaaasssseeee take
> a look at why my module is not comming up on all the pages on
> phpwebsite 0.9.3-2 even though $allow_view="all" was set in boost? I
> checked it in the DB and everything looked to be correct but it just
> doesn't work and only works when I go to it specifically like
> http://localhost/?module=test
>
> I simply want to have it show up in all pages like the menu maker
> module and alike. I looked even copied menu maker and stripped it to
> make it basic but still didn't work?
>
> Please please please please help me :-\
>
> My test module can be downloaded at
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?
> group_id=15539&atid=115539&file_id=74246&aid=881253
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Jake
>
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2004, at 6:13 AM, Don Seiler wrote:
>
>> You could just take the plunge and have your next version be 1.0.0.
>> Then go 1.1.0 etc from there on.
>>
>> The 3-digit approach is correct because it signifies major-minor-patch
>> releases.
>>
>> Don.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0600, Meiste, Gregory wrote:
>>>    Hi all!
>>>
>>>
>>>    I've been working on an update to my mailing lists module.  The
>>>    current version is 0.3.3 - however, it is currently being reported
>>> to
>>>    boost to be 0.33
>>>
>>>
>>>    I have been using numbers with only one decimal in the version
>>> number
>>>    since 0.10 because I didn't realize that "0.1.0" (with quotes)
>>> would
>>>    be accepted by boost.  Now, everyone is using the two decimal
>>> approach
>>>    but me.  I believe the two decimal approach is a "more correct"
>>> way to
>>>    report versions and would like to switch to it.
>>>
>>>
>>>    My question is this: When I update to 0.4.0, can I report "0.4.0"
>>> to
>>>    boost and all will update well?  I don't want to cause problems
>>> with
>>>    people's sites can I'm being anal about a version number.  If it  
>>> is
>>>    too risky I'll just stick to 0.40.  However, I wouldn't think it
>>> would
>>>    cause any problems, but I'm throwing it out to you guys for your
>>>    opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>>    What do you think?  Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>>
>>>    Greg
>>>
>>>    "blindman1314"
>>
>> -- 
>> "When I'm the president, we're not going to obfuscate when it comes to
>> foreign
>> policy."
>>
>> George W. Bush
>> January 7, 2000
>> Republican Debate in New Hampshire.
>